Epping migrant hotel ordered to close after High Court injunction

The council argued that the use of the hotel breached planning regulations, while the Home Office claimed its closure would cause “acute difficulties” and risk infringing asylum seekers’ rights. Mr Justice Eyre ruled that the strength of the council’s case justified an injunction until a full hearing is held later this year.

Epping migrant hotel closure sparks national political response

The decision follows weeks of tension in Epping. Protests outside the hotel escalated after a 41-year-old Ethiopian asylum seeker was charged with sexual assault and related offences involving a teenage girl and an adult woman. He has denied the allegations and remains in custody. A separate resident, a Syrian national, faces unrelated charges. The cases intensified public concern and led to large-scale demonstrations.

Clashes between anti-immigration and anti-racism groups in the town resulted in 28 arrests, with 16 people charged. Police have maintained a strong presence at the site, warning the unrest was a sign of broader tensions surrounding asylum housing.

Community tensions linked to asylum seekers housing in Essex

Local reaction to the court ruling was immediate. Some residents gathered outside the Bell Hotel to celebrate the injunction, describing it as a relief for families living nearby. Protest organiser Sarah White said: “This is not just for Epping but for the rest of the country.”

Other residents echoed her views, calling the decision overdue after months of campaigning. Maureen Chapman, 73, said the ruling had “restored” her confidence in local decision-making after feeling under threat by the hotel’s use.

Legal challenge leads to Bell Hotel closure order

In court, counsel for Epping Forest District Council argued that the Bell Hotel was no longer operating within its designated planning use. Philip Coppel KC said the site had become a “catalyst for unrest” and that its proximity to schools posed additional risks.

Somani Hotels Limited, the owner of the property, defended its contracts with the Home Office, describing the injunction as “draconian” and warning it would cause hardship for asylum seekers. Its lawyers said the business relied on accommodation contracts as a financial lifeline.

The High Court noted that while a definitive planning breach had not yet been proven, the balance of risks justified the interim order. The case will return for a longer hearing to determine whether the injunction should be made permanent, according to the judgment.

Planning disputes at centre of Epping migrant hotel ruling

Somani Hotels argued it had previously applied for temporary planning permission but later withdrew its request. Its legal team said the use of the hotel to house asylum seekers had been tolerated for years without formal enforcement action.

Justice Eyre concluded that the “risk of injustice” was greater if no injunction were granted, given the scale of local unrest. The ruling prevents further accommodation of asylum seekers at the Bell Hotel until the scheduled hearing.

Future implications of migrant protests and asylum housing policy

The closure of the Epping migrant hotel is likely to influence broader debates on the Home Office’s reliance on commercial hotels to house asylum seekers. Local councils across the country have raised objections, citing planning breaches, pressure on services, and community tensions.

Also Read: UK Lowers Voting Age to 16 Ahead of Next General Election

Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch welcomed the injunction as “a victory for parents in Epping who just want their children to be safe.” Reform UK leader Nigel Farage called it “an inspiration to other councils.” Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said residents should not have had to fight their government to secure safety in their town.

A permanent ruling is expected later this year, with national attention focused on how the decision could affect the future of asylum housing in the United Kingdom.